Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 73.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2013-08-07 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | $ 159.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 509 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the LG G2's score of 73.7. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design has the same thickness than the LG G2, but it is a lot heavier.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than LG G2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. LG G2 has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a lot smaller screen, a bit worse pixel density and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than LG G2, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor, a much higher 108 MP resolution back camera, a lot larger camera aperture for better low light captures and video and a much higher video definition. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior memory for games and applications than LG G2, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery duration than LG G2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get LG G2, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.