Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.65 | 9.36 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-06 | 2016-10-04 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1157.00 | $ 280.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3510mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 11.65, which is way better than Moto Z Play's score of 9.36. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is noticeably newer than Moto Z Play, it is thicker and way heavier.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Play, because it has a greater pixels density, a much higher 1440 x 3200px resolution and a larger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a larger camera aperture, a way higher video quality and a back camera with way more mega-pixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3510mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z Play. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z Play, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.