Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-03-06 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.42 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, having a general score of 98 against 90.5. Although it's the best phone we compare here, we must note that it's also a a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker phone. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has Android 13 operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a better display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much higher 108 MP resolution camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.