Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 75.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2020-07-24 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.40 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Alpha grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4315mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting a general score of 98 against 75.4. Although it's the best in this comparison review, we must highlight that it's also a just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a quite larger display and a better screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features superior battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera with way more MP and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.