Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98 | 75.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-06 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cosmic black and Cosmic grey | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 509 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.42 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is much better than the vivo X60's global score of 75.1. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than vivo X60. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and vivo X60 has Android 11, so it provides a couple additional features.
Vivo X60 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better screen than vivo X60, because it has a better pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better camera than vivo X60, and although they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X60, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has greater battery performance than vivo X60, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.