Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is much better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a much newer phone, and it's also just a bit thinner and a little lighter than LG V50 ThinQ. These devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10.
Galaxy S22 has a more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little bit lower screen density and a quite smaller display. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S22, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S22 has a greater camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photos, a lot better video definition and a camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the LG V50 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.