Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is better than vivo X60 Pro, with a 93.4 score against 78.8. The Galaxy S22 is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro, but both are 0.3inches thick. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, so it offers some nice extra features and optimized performance.
Vivo X60 Pro has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has a sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better display density.
Galaxy S22 has a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a way higher video definition, a back camera with a better 50 megapixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality. The vivo X60 Pro has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.