Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S23 Ultra's 81.5 score. IPhone X counts with a brighter display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little lower screen density and a lot worse resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
Apple iPhone X has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Apple iPhone X has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone X, because it has a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures, a larger diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.