Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 500 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a score of 82, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S23 Ultra's 81.5 score. IPhone XR has a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores and 5 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone XR has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a quite smaller screen, a lot lower count of pixels in each inch of display and a lot worse 828 x 1792 resolution.
Galaxy S23 Ultra features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S23 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a lot more mega pixels back camera and a larger aperture for better captures in low-light situations.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 70% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.