Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 500 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.43 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is a little bit better than LG V10, with a general score of 81.5 against 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra design is just a bit thicker but much lighter than LG V10. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has 13 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version.
The LG V10 counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM. The LG V10 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a bit higher display density.
LG V10 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S23 Ultra features a much longer battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than LG V10, because it has a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a camera in the back with a much better 200 mega-pixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.