Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's 81.5 overall score. The LG Velvet features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a just a bit inferior pixel amount in each display inch and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2460, they both have a screen of the same size.
LG Velvet features a much greater processing power than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. LG Velvet has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots a bit better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, because it has a much more megapixels back camera, a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations. Galaxy S23 Ultra has better battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 16% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.