Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Galaxy S23 Ultra's score of 81.5. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13. Galaxy A51 5G has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little inferior pixels amount per inch in the display and a little smaller screen. Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11% more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos, a way more mega pixels back camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.