Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, getting a score of 94.6 against 81.5. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a much worse pixels number per screen inch and a bit worse 1768 x 2208px resolution, it also counts with a little larger display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations, a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with a way higher 200 MP resolution. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.