Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 500 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy S23 Ultra, with a global score of 87.9 against 81.5. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version while Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a much heavier cellphone than the Galaxy S23 Ultra, but both of them are equally thin.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a just a little lower pixel density, a quite smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features as much storage to store more games and applications as Galaxy S23 Ultra, both of them have equal internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a much worse resolution camera, a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lot worse quality photographs and videos and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and video.
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.