Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 500 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a general score of 81.5, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 general score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S23 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both count with really similar displays, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite smaller display and a just a little less pixels per inch of display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Galaxy S23 Ultra count with really similar battery durations, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.