Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3080 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 500 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 740 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 69.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a score of 81.5, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's score of 79. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy S23 Ultra has 13 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, giving some extra features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S both feature really similar displays, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a little smaller screen, a little bit lower screen density and a lot worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra takes a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a larger aperture, a lot larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a much higher 200 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a battery performance that is just as good as Galaxy S23 Ultra's battery life, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 0 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.