Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android |
| -- | 2019-09-04 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.27 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than the Galaxy S24 Ultra's 80.2 score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior processor than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, a much lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a camera with a way lower resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.