Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S24 Ultra's score of 80.2. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a much greater processing power than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2960px, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
Galaxy Note9 has a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note9's camera is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra one, although the Galaxy Note9 has a lot less mega pixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra has improved battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.