Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2015-11-02 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 6.28 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Google Nexus 6P, getting a 90.7 score against 80.3. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and much lighter cellphone than the Google Nexus 6P. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures, a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments and a lot better video quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.