Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-09-29 |
| -- | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is better than LG V20's overall score of 77. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is extremely thinner and notably lighter than LG V20. LG V20 features a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than LG V20, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than LG V20, because it has a much more mega pixels camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor, a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments and a way higher video quality.
The LG V20 counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.