Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is slightly better than LG V50 ThinQ, with a overall score of 90.7 against 83.7. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, giving a couple nice extra features. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is thinner and lighter than LG V50 ThinQ.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower screen density and a little lower 1440 x 3088 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a much bigger sensor and a camera with a lot better 200 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.