Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-06 |
| -- | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Moto Z4, with a overall score of 90.7 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra design is way lighter and noticeably thinner than Moto Z4. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it offers a lot of extra features.
Moto Z4 counts with a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Moto Z4, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a quite bigger display and a bit greater pixels amount in each inch of display.
The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos, a way higher video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.