Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-21 |
| -- | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.23 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A12, with a 90.7 score against 80.3. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and notably thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy A12.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger screen and a lot more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A12, because it has a camera in the back with way more MP, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited environments. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A12, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A12's battery duration is very similar to the Galaxy S25 Ultra one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.