Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-20 |
| -- | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than Galaxy A60's 82.3 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is notably lighter and incredibly thinner than Galaxy A60. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Galaxy A60 has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy A60 features a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A60, because it has a just a bit better pixel density, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a little larger display.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better camera than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a back camera with a way higher resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a much bigger sensor. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 47% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.