Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-20 |
| -- | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.74 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A7 (2018)'s general score of 84.2. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is way lighter and extremely thinner than the Galaxy A7 (2018). Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a little bit greater pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.