Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| -- | 2019-09-04 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.27 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy A90 5G's general score of 90.5. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably thinner and way lighter cellphone than Galaxy A90 5G. Galaxy S25 Ultra comes with Android 14 operating system, while Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a quite larger display, a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much higher 200 MP resolution back camera, a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.