Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-29 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.74 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M30s's 83.3 general score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter phone than Galaxy M30s. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Galaxy M30s has Android 11 version.
Galaxy M30s has a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little bit better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30s, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a lot better video quality, a bigger aperture and a much larger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.