Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass; metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's general score of 78.3. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an way older device than the vivo X70 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The vivo X70 Pro features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 192 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X70 Pro features a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster). The vivo X70 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4450mAh battery size. Vivo X70 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments, a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.