Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-06-10 | 2022-03-18 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2022) is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a global score of 86.6 against 75.8. IPhone SE (2022) is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also extremely thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking screen than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has much worse brightness, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display, a little bigger screen and a much better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 200 GB. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a superior performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also has a larger number of faster cores and a 64 bits processor.
IPhone SE (2022) features a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and a same resolution back facing camera, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with higher video frame rates.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2018mAh.
The iPhone SE (2022) costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.