Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-03-11 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy S7, with a general score of 81 against 79.5. Although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S7, it's thinner and also newer. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a way better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot less MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy C9 Pro features superior battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.