Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2018-03-16 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9's 83.3 general score. The Galaxy A80 body is newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy S9. The Galaxy S9 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Galaxy S9 features a bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy S9 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A80, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A80 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and/or video in low light environments and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A80 features greater battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.