Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Tizen 4.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 1.57 x 1.57 x 0.43 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 1.31 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Stainless steel: Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 430.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 360 x 360 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9110 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Dual-Core 1150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 0 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 247mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is way better than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), with an 87.5 score against 52.7. The Samsung Galaxy A71 comes with Android 11 OS, while Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm) works with Tizen 4.0 OS. Samsung Galaxy A71's design is thinner but much heavier than the Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), and both of them were only released 4 months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because although it has a just a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy A71 counts with a more powerful CPU than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because it has 6 more CPU cores and more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a very superior camera than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm). The Galaxy A71 counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A71 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Watch Active 2 (40mm), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.