Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-07-20 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, with an 84.9 score against 73.8. IPhone 11 Pro's design is a little heavier but thinner than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and they were only released 2 months apart. The iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S comes with Android 10 OS.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a much sharper display than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a much higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a larger display and a much higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. IPhone 11 Pro has a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP and a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy Xcover 4S has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a bit better battery life than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 3046mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.