Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2021-03-12 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro has a score of 84.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's overall score of 78.1. The iPhone 11 Pro is an older and just a little heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, but Apple managed to make it somewhat thinner anyway. IPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 operating system.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 11 Pro counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a little bit bigger display, a way better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a higher screen density.
Galaxy XCover 5 features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 5 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 3046mAh battery size.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a much worse resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.