Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, with an 84.9 score against 78.1. Samsung Galaxy A80's body is older, extremely heavier and a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. Samsung Galaxy A80 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has more RAM.
Galaxy A80 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a higher pixels amount in each inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A80 features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a lot better resolution back camera. Samsung Galaxy A80 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 23 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.