Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover 5, having a general score of 85.5 against 78.1. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is just a little bit thinner than Galaxy XCover 5, although it is just a bit heavier and was released many years before. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way better 1080 x 2246 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a greater display pixels density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 768 GB smaller, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features better battery life than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.