Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-08-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Asus ZenFone AR, with a score of 81 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's design is incredibly newer than Asus ZenFone AR's, but it is thicker and incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster).
Asus ZenFone AR features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Asus ZenFone AR has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Asus ZenFone AR shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera with a worse 23 MP resolution and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a lot bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with better battery duration than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has a 23 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.