Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is just a little thinner than Motorola Edge 50, although it is a little bit heavier and was released many years before.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a little bit higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and a quite higher pixel count per display inch. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's one, both have equal internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.