Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's score of 81. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Galaxy Z Flip design is notably newer and a little bit lighter, but a little bit thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit larger screen, a little bit better pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip has a better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.