Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Sony Xperia XZ1, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 78.3. The Galaxy Z Flip body is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Sony Xperia XZ1. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more vivid display than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a larger display.
Xperia XZ1 features more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 has a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in poorly lited situations and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Sony Xperia XZ1 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a camera in the back with much more MP.
The Galaxy Z Flip has superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more money than the Xperia XZ1, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.