Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Xperia XZ3, with an 88.5 score against 79.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a newer cellphone, and it's also much thinner and a little lighter than Xperia XZ3. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xperia XZ3 has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xperia XZ3 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ3 also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Sony Xperia XZ3's battery life is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's battery lifetime, although the Sony Xperia XZ3 also has 3330mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than Xperia XZ3, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.