Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than vivo X60 Pro, with an 88.5 score against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older and a little bit heavier cellphone than vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides you some additional features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a just a little greater pixels number in each screen inch, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a bit larger screen. Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip and the vivo X60 Pro have really similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The vivo X60 Pro takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video quality, the same aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.