Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50's score of 81.2. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is thinner than the Motorola Edge 50, but it's much heavier and was released many years before. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite lower 1220 x 2712 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Edge 50 features as much storage to store more games and applications as the Galaxy Z Fold 2, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.