Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Samsung Galaxy A80, having a general score of 94.6 against 84.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and way thinner, but noticeably heavier than Samsung Galaxy A80. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger display and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A80 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, lower video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much higher 48 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.