Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Moto G Stylus, getting a 90.6 score against 79.7. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is newer and thinner than Moto G Stylus's, although it is also notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G Stylus and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 have very similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a way lower 1080 x 2300 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Moto G Stylus shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Moto G Stylus features a bit more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.