Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z4's 79.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is a lot newer and thinner, but also heavier than Motorola Moto Z4. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10, offering some extra features and performance enhancements.
Moto Z4 features a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although the Moto Z4 has a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. The Moto Z4 has a little bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger camera aperture and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has longer battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.