Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3, with a global score of 91.8 against 90.6. The Galaxy A71 5G is an older and much thicker device than the Galaxy Z Fold 3, but Samsung made it notably lighter anyway. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A71 5G features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.