Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A80's 84.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is noticeably newer and much thinner than Galaxy A80's, although it's heavier. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A80 has a display that's just as good as the Galaxy Z Fold 3 one, because although the Galaxy A80 has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A80 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has a 19 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.