Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is better than Xperia XZ3's overall score of 79.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is extremely newer and noticeably thinner, but also a lot heavier than the Xperia XZ3. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xperia XZ3 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a better memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with greater battery lifetime than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. The Sony Xperia XZ3 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.