Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's general score of 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is much newer and incredibly thinner than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, but it is notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2246 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better display density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.